FROM PAST 34 YEARS , 17 VILLAGES HAVE THEIR POST OFFICE IN KACHCHA GHAR (JHOPDI)

• Home/
• rajasthan/
• FROM PAST 34 YEARS , 17 VILLAGES HAVE THEIR POST OFFICE IN KACHCHA GHAR (JHOPDI)  

FROM PAST 34 YEARS , 17 VILLAGES HAVE THEIR POST OFFICE IN KACHCHA GHAR (JHOPDI)

via
The news is really heart breaking , at one side we are going cashless and on the other side our Post Offices aren't having enough resources to be able to develop with him . Is government negligent or the people aren't taking any step. Our country is the fastest growing economy in the world but such failure gives us a set back.

via

In this race of going at the top , we shouldn't forget our roots. India is a country with maximum natural resources , therefore constructing a Pakka House for the Post Office is not a big deal. The authorities should make a proper check of this issue and should provide the required facility to the villagers , at least proper staff at Post Office should be appointed and sole responsibility of this branch should be sub-divided among other new branches.

via

Development is the key factor that has boasted our economy but looking after our present system is also equally important.
These locations are sharing that one single Post Office NARAYANPURA, KARNINAGAR, GANESHNAGAR, BABE KA DHORA , PABUPURA,  GANESHPURA, MATOL, KHEGASAR , SHIVSAGAR , BANNE SINGHPURA , VISHANSAR , MAHADEVNAGAR , MATOL TONK , CHEELSAR , etc.

 There are only two workers in this single Post Office shared by many and they are struggling to provide necessary services to their customers which isn't a good thing. Burden should be reduced and they should get proper staff for serving their customers.

via

It seems to be not justified that only two for seventeen , travelling matters to deliver the posts and so does time and energy . In this time to 4G network , if our mails are not delivered within 4 days by posts then having such facility is also useless for all of us. People  should complain and raise their voice towards this topic. Somebody needs to do it then why not us.